The boat spends a fair amount of time in the Center Island vicinity. By the time it comes out of the Center Island lagoon, the sun begins to set. You can view the changing color of the sky on the upper deck and it is just charming.
Then the boat will pick up the speed a little and goes around the Center Island. The south side of the island faces the open Lake Ontario. By this time, it is already sunset so it is the perfect time to enjoy the included dinner. The boat conveniently starts the last leg of the cruise when you are about to finish dinner. It will enter the harbor again from the west. This is the best time to snap a picture of Toronto’s skyline at night before docking at Queen’s Quay again.

Toronto financial district - a valve in the Canadian economic engine; the tallest buildings (except for the CN Tower) are the headquarters of our major banks.

The playground
Located in Coldwater, Ontario (how cool is the name!), Mt. St. Louis is just a little more than an hour away from Toronto. Take Hightway 400 North and get off at Exit 131, you have arrived the ski resort. The resort has 2 base camps but they both have acces to the same hills. The Mount St. Louis camp has easier access to bunny slopes whereas the Moonstone camp covers larger area of blue and black diamonds. Interestingly though, I personally feel the blue diamonds on the Moonstone side are less as steep as the ones over on the Mt. St. Louis side.
Take the Summit Six Express lift from the Mt. St. Louis camp to the hilltop and you can snap a very nice picture of the surrounding area before you descend downhill.
From the other camp, the Promenade Six Express lift takes you to he Big Lonely trail, which is one of the most romantic trail of the hill.I’m not a very avid skiier, so I started my day with a warm up of Sundance, then Holiday and the Big Lonely before doing a few more blue diamond trails on both hills. The day was a great fun and the trip was a reasonable one-day getaway although the lack of equipment rentals near the resort by locals practically gives the resort a monopoly.
]]>
This is already on the table when our table was ready!
Their all-you-can-eat dinner is just slightly less than $23 per adult on weekends. Considering their quality of service and food, it is well worth the money. We had a small party but even so, the sushi chefs have 2 sushi boats ready for us before we were seated. Did I say we didn’t even order?! This is amazingly thoughtful! After an hour long wait watching all kinds of food passing by you, the first thing you want after you are seated is just eat! Their menu boasts all kinds of sushi, maki, sashimi, and even teppan. There are dessert, too! The beauty of their desserts is that they come in small portion just right for sampling all of them!
Personal favorites: Spider Maki and Mango Shooters
Ten-Ichi Japanese Cuisine
4810 Sheppard Ave. East, Scarborough
416-297-5787
When you get off the QEW onto Niagara Stone Road, your are in the wine region of Ontario. After about 11 km, you’ll see a very modern boxy structure on your right. That’s Jackson Triggs, our first winery. They are a mid-size operation but with very fine Icewine. Their tour is an affordable $5. The tour guide is very informative. While they may not take you to the field, they take you to the production facility (fermentation sticks…) and their cellar. You get to taste 3 of their wines - a white, a red, and an Icewine. Personal favorite: Gewurztraminer (Proprietors’ Grand Reserve).
After you get back on Niagara Stone Road, continue to Niagara-on-the-lake and you’ll meet John Street less than a kilometer away. Take a right for slightly less than 2 km, you’ll arrive our next destination, the Peller Estate. They are one of the largest in the region that can consistently produce Icewine year after year. Their tasting tour is also an affordable $5. They take you to the field as well as their showcase cellar, where you’ll have your tasting of three wines - a white, a red, and an Icewine. If you ask, the tour guide will even take you through, step by step, how to taste wine so that you look like an expert next time you go to a restaurant. Oh! Don’t forget to try all of their Icewines at the tasting bar. Personal favorites: Vidal and their Icewine jam.
Continue southeast on John Street. At about half a kilometer, there you’ll meet Niagara River Boulevard. Take a right and cruise along. Take the time to stop by and take some photos or walk along the river. This is the best Sunday afternoon drive according to Sir Winston Churchill - Yes! That Winston Churchill during World War II. After slightly less than 3 km on the boulevard, you’ll arrive our final winery, the Reif Estate. This is a large production. I only visited their tasting bar and shop and bought a bottle of Icewine Carbenet Franc.
]]>Ask any economist, he or she will tell you that just because we can make furnitures doesn’t mean that we should make furnitures. One country’s specialization in international trade is based on comparative advantage. In other words, we do it not just because we can, but because we can do it better (and in today’s economy, that usually means cheaper) than others. This is what will attract investment. This is what will help us compete in the world. Look at what happen to our automotive industry, an industry that we totally can do it, but we can’t because we don’t have comparative advantage anymore.
Jack Layton and the NDPs are clueless on the economy. They don’t understand economics. Even the idea of them being the official opposition sends a chill down my back!
]]>Quebec will soon sign an agreement with France that provides labor mobility to their citizens. This will set a tone for the upcoming Canada-EU free trade negotiation, and if succeed, will provide citizens of the two jurisdictions free labor mobility. This is both exciting and visionary. As I study the more on the topic of trade, I become an advocate of free labor mobility as a solution for changing economies.
This is an especially good news for people in the knowledge-based economy. As jobs demand more and more highly-specialized skills like science, technology, and finance, and shift in the economy will make it particularly painful for highly-skilled workers to adjust. Not all Ph.D. in biology can be retrained into a CFA. And you’ll be scared to have an i-banker retrained to work in the lab likewise. By giving labor the ability to move to other regions or countries where their skills are needed, the knowledge and experience will not be lost.
Certainly, how well this works out depends on what the two countries have to offer each other. But this certainly is a good first step towards a broader labor mobility agreement between EU and Canada.
]]>Today, Prime Minister Stephen Harper pledged to open up for more foreign investment if Conservatives wins the upcoming election. Certainly, both trade proponents and opponents immediately jump on to comment. Stephen Harper believes that more FDI will benefit Canada and create more jobs. Opponents, on the other hand, condemn such move is “selling off” Canada.
One fact to consider is that thanks to our previous and current governments’ fiscal discipline, Canada has been running a surplus budget for the past few years. At the same time, domestic savings outpaced the actual amount of domestic investment. Macroeconomist will tell you that domestic savings is equal to domestic investment and net capital outflow. If we have more domestic savings than investment, that means our net capital outflow, defined by outflow of direct investment subtracted by inflow of direct investment, must be positive. That means we are sending money out to invest in other countries.
From a business standpoint, as long as a project yields positive return, then it is a good investment. It does not matter where the investment is. So if there is an attractive investment opportunity overseas, firms will invest. Does that mean Canadian firms investing overseas will necessarily consolidate back-office jobs over there to Canada and create more Canadian jobs? Not really, right? Because it depends on what kind of investment a firm is undertaking. If it is an offshoring investment, then we probably will not see Canadian jobs created here. On the other hand, if it is buying up a coal mine in South America, then we can probably expect some Canadian engineers will be sent there. So if we can’t say a foreign investment by a Canadian firm is good or bad without looking at what the investment is, how can we say that FDI by foreign firms in Canada must be good or bad?
The fact that Canadian firms choose to invest abroad, as reflected by our trade data, suggests per macroeconomic theory of comparative advantage that it is more profitable for these firms to invest aborad. So if the money has gone abroad, where do we get money to finance our domestic projects? One source is the government, which we all know how well will that go. The other source is FDI. One thing to note is that it doesn’t matter who finance these projects as long as they are profitable in the long run. It is not so ideal if it is a hostile takeover, which is bound to eliminate jobs. However, that is the nature of competition and that may happen even we only have domestic competition. Overall, FDI brings in tangible capital and intangible know-hows that are good for our economy by raising productivity.
So are we selling off our national assets? Nationalism and protectionism aside, the biggest disadvantage is losing control at the firm level. The government can still exert control through regulations. Profits will have to be shared with the new owners but our governments do not lose the tax revenue. Even though some jobs will be eliminated, some will be created. FDI that makes a Canadian firms subsidiaries and hence eliminates back-office jobs will create job opportunities in the finance sectors. Some will win, some will lose. That is the nature of our changing economy.
]]>Over the past few weeks, the crude oil price has dropped significantly. However, the gasoline price of shot up 13 cents per litre last Friday when hurricane Ike was hitting Texas. That is even more expensive than the summer when oil price was at record high close to $150 USD per barrel.
I don’t know what is so wrong with the pricing mechanism of gasoline, but what I find it most bewildering is how come Canada, as an oil-producing and exporting nation, have to suffer from such high gasoline price when the hurricane is not even hitting our shores!
I am a zealous believers of free market economy so I am not even going to ponder the notion of nationalizing our oil industry in Canada. Trade is based on the idea of comparative advantage and all trading partners are better off as a result of trade. Better off means that the total output (hence consumption) is higher. However, if most of our oil are sent to the United States and in turns, we have to buy the gasoline back from them, how is this better off for Canadians? Perhaps it’s time to consider investing in building more oil refineries to increase capacity?
]]>When it comes to economy, the Conservative gets it, the NDP doesn’t! Buddhist has a saying that the only constant in this univese is change. We are living in the 21st century and our economy is constantly changing. It used to be cheaper to produce cars in Canada and that is why we had an auto industry. Now the WHOLE WORLD can produce cheaper than Canada, why would companies continue to produce here? If we want an auto industry to remain here, we need to compete in low cost, as low as those workers in third world countries. Without addressing the issue of high labor cost, any money throwing into the manufacturing sector is not sustainable. A government can’t tell investors to come in and then use legislature to lock them in here. That does not encourage investment, that only scares off investment. Companies make business decisions, not patriotic decisions because government doesn’t own companies, shareholders do. NDP, get real!
Let’s take a closer look at NDP’s plan:
- $4 billion over four years to help the auto industry design and produce environmentally friendly cars and trucks.
- $3 billion would go towards retraining workers for so-called “green-collar” jobs in the environmental industry.
- Adopting a made-in-Canada procurement for the federal government and its agencies.
- $400 million on a job protection commissioner charged with investigating major layoffs and plant shutdowns to prevent jobs from leaving Canada.
If the $4 billion is mostly in designing, not producing, environmentally-friendly cars, these manufacturing workers will not benefit directly and at most reap filter-down benefits. If the spending is mostly on producing without addressing the issue of labor cost, any initial production will eventually erode away to cheap labor overseas. It is simply not sustainable.
Simply tag on “green” does not make a job sustainable. Even if we have a “green” car ready to be produced tomorrow, the jobs will still eventually go overseas without addressing the high labor cost issue. Charging a premium on putting solar panels on the roof will make these alternative energy unattractive and not a sustainable business model. The list will just go on and on. Labor cost is an issue that unfortunately cannot and should not be addressed by government, but by the market.
“Made in Canada” policy sounds good for campaign, but what happens if Bombardier decides to charge the City of Toronto more for subway cars than Siemens? You get the idea.
Government can investigate why jobs are leaving Canada, but they are likely wasting their times. At the end of the day, jobs leaving Canada because of labor cost. It is one thing for a financially stressed company to simply declare insolvent to avoid severance. It is another if the company is making a legitimate business decision.
Workers must focus on retraining. There are more options that you think. Seek help from career counsellors.
]]>Then don’t complain the government is out of touch with the people, because the leading party is not representing the people, they are simply the party that disgust you least. It’s time to vote for a party that you believe in (most)!
]]>